Compare Two Paths
Score two options side-by-side and see which has the stronger structural foundation.
Try an example
Based on your option descriptions
Scores are structural starting points, not recommendations. You can adjust all values to ensure they reflect your own assessment before comparing.
Adjust each factor for both options
Reversibility
How easily can this be undone?
A50
B50
Upside Potential
How significant is the potential gain?
A50
B50
Downside Severity
If it fails, how damaging is the outcome?
A50
B50
Downside Likelihood
How likely is the negative outcome?
A50
B50
Dependency Risk
How exposed are you to external factors?
A50
B50
Long-Term Alignment
How aligned is this with your long-term direction?
A50
B50
Structural Comparison
Option A
Elevated Risk
Value50
Risk38
Safety50%
Option B
Elevated Risk
Value50
Risk38
Safety50%
Both paths are structurally identical
Adjust the factors above — the gap between paths will emerge as you differentiate them.
Where the difference comes from
50
Reversibility
↑ higher is better
50
50
Upside Potential
↑ higher is better
50
50
Downside Severity
↓ lower is better
50
50
Downside Likelihood
↓ lower is better
50
50
Dependency Risk
↓ lower is better
50
50
Long-Term Alignment
↑ higher is better
50
Option AOption B
Structural comparison only. For in-depth blindspot and outcome analysis, run either option through the full Run a Decision flow.